as anticipated in the introduction

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "as anticipated in the introduction" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer back to something that was mentioned or expected in the introduction of a document or presentation. Example: "The results of the study align with the findings as anticipated in the introduction, confirming our initial hypothesis."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Lastly, as anticipated in the Introduction, we end this section with a brief discussion on how results derived from non-experimental and quasi-experimental studies compare as regards the effects of temporary work on, say, earnings or employment stability.

SERIEs

As anticipated in the Introduction, this is not a simple question and thus neither can the answer itself be simple.

Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

This is the main advantage of harmonic tags as already anticipated in the "Introduction" section.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

However, as already anticipated in the Introduction, several lines of evidence indicate that Bub1 contributes to this interaction (Discussion).

eLife

The SNP did not do as well as it anticipated in the Scottish government elections.

The Guardian - Opinion

As anticipated in Sect.

Biomedical Optics Express

We anticipated earlier in the introduction that the construction of the agent is the topic of our choice to critically discuss the contact points between the understanding of responsibility in RRI and in neoliberalism.

Life Sciences, Society and Policy

The headliners were as anticipated.

Huffington Post

The licensure of the PCV7 vaccine resulted in a marked decline in invasive pneumococcal disease [58], and further reductions are anticipated with the introduction of PCV13.

Plosone

It was anticipated that the introduction of small substituents on the phenyl ring in 7a would be well tolerated without altering its orientation in the kinase active site.

Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters

It could be anticipated that the introduction of CGM may increase anxiety and burden for both parents and patients, resulting in a decrease in their HR-QOL.

Acta Diabetologica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "as anticipated in the introduction" to effectively link back to previously stated expectations or hypotheses within a document, ensuring clarity and coherence for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "as anticipated in the introduction" when referring to information not explicitly mentioned or clearly implied in the introduction. It should serve as a reminder, not an introduction to new concepts.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "as anticipated in the introduction" functions as an adverbial phrase, modifying a clause by indicating that the information being presented aligns with what was previously expected or predicted in the introduction. Ludwig confirms this is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "as anticipated in the introduction" is a formal phrase used to connect current information with expectations or predictions stated in the introduction. According to Ludwig, it is grammatically correct and suitable for formal and scientific writing. Although less common, its use provides coherence to academic papers, reports, and presentations. Related phrases like "as predicted in the opening" or "consistent with the introductory remarks" can be used as alternatives to avoid redundancy. When using the phrase, ensure the information referred to was indeed anticipated and not entirely new.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

as predicted in the opening

Replaces "anticipated" with "predicted" and "introduction" with "opening", maintaining the sense of prior expectation.

as foreseen in the preamble

Substitutes "anticipated" with "foreseen" and "introduction" with "preamble", emphasizing a prior view or expectation at the outset.

as expected from the initial remarks

Uses "expected" in place of "anticipated" and describes the introduction as "initial remarks", keeping the meaning similar.

in line with what was foreshadowed initially

Employs "foreshadowed" to replace "anticipated" and uses "initially" instead of "in the introduction", conveying a similar sense of prior indication.

consistent with the introductory remarks

Focuses on consistency with the introduction's content, replacing "anticipated" with a broader concept of alignment.

mirroring the initial expectations

Highlights the mirroring of expectations set in the introduction, differing slightly in tone.

following the premise laid out at the start

Shifts the focus to the premise established in the introduction, rather than direct anticipation.

according to the initial setup

Replaces "anticipated" with a focus on accordance to the initial context or setup.

as the opening implied

Shortens the phrase and focuses on the implication made in the opening section.

corroborating the introductory statement

Emphasizes that something corroborates a statement made at the beginning, rather than being anticipated.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "as anticipated in the introduction" to avoid repetition?

You can use alternatives like "as expected from the outset", "in line with the initial premises", or "consistent with the introductory remarks".

Is it appropriate to use "as anticipated in the introduction" in informal writing?

While grammatically correct, "as anticipated in the introduction" is more suited for formal writing. In informal contexts, simpler phrases like "as we thought" or "as expected" might be more appropriate.

What's the difference between "as anticipated in the introduction" and "as stated in the introduction"?

"As stated in the introduction" refers to information explicitly mentioned. "As anticipated in the introduction" implies that something was predicted or logically followed from what was presented initially, it might not have been verbatim. For example, if the introduction says "we expect to find X", you can say later "as anticipated in the introduction, we have found X."

Can I use "as anticipated in the introduction" even if the anticipation wasn't explicit?

It's best to use "as anticipated in the introduction" when the anticipation is clear or strongly implied. If the connection is weak or requires significant interpretation, a different phrasing might be more accurate. You can use instead something like "following the principles outlined in the introduction".