The phrase "as actually observed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to something that has been seen or experienced in reality, often in a scientific or observational context.
Example: "The results of the experiment were consistent with the predictions, as actually observed during the trials."
Alternatives: "as seen in reality" or "as noted in practice".
Incorporation of Pd impurities during carbon growth implies that nanofilament length depends on initial particle size, as actually observed.
Using BS 6779, the mass of the vehicle as actually observed on an Indian national highway (Table 4) has been used.
To get some idea of the importance of this type of bias, a benchmark distribution is constructed that assumes interprovincial migrants are distributed across the N source provinces as actually observed in each year, while each migrant from a specific source province is distributed among the remaining N-1 destination provinces in line with the non-migrant population share.
For the corresponding number of degrees of freedom (DOF=npoints – nparameters), – 19 for the LNTH and 16 for the sigmoid, – the corresponding p-value is p ~ 0.05 (p-value is the probability of obtaining experimental data at least as far from their expected values, as actually observed, assuming that the statistical hypothesis under test is correct).
He didn't seem too upset, because he was just as happy talking about it as actually observing it.
Moreover, this mechanism could induce an elevation in HR response, as was actually observed in the present investigation.
Then, the strength of evidence against the tested hypothesis is equal to the p-value the p-value the of obtaining a result that is as least as extreme as the actually observed data.
This knowledge allows computing the p value, that is, the probability of obtaining a statistic under the null that is at least as extreme as the actually observed one.
The P-values obtained correspond to the probability, under our model, of observing as many, or as few occurrences of the motif as were actually observed.
Whilst there was a non-significant trend towards a larger effect of poor adherence in the group of participants monitored without CD4 cell counts, perhaps the most important finding was that optimal adherence with clinical monitoring seemed to provide as good overall survival outcomes as those actually observed in the group receiving CD4 monitoring in the trial.
If arsenic operates via multiple mechanisms in multiple dose windows, then one would expect a genomics pattern as complex as the one actually observed.
