Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
Today, only 43 per cent Republicans accept evolution as a valid theory.
The Everyday Champions Church's application to run a faith-based secondary in Newark, Nottinghamshire, has been accepted by the Department for Education and put through to the "interview stage" - even though the DfE published guidance in May banning the teaching of creationism as a valid theory.
Similar(56)
Turns out, it's being cited by fundamentalist schools in Louisiana as proof that evolution cannot be a valid theory.
This study offers five tests as a step in the direction of identifying a valid theory, or theories, of why many countries have experienced significant crime declines.
Here in the UK we are fortunate that there is a strong political consensus against the teaching of creationism in schools as a scientifically valid theory.
Similarly, "The vast majority of scientists accept evolution as a scientifically valid theory" (Rutledge and Sadler 2007) and "Up to this point in college, how many courses have you had with evolutionary themes (e.g., biology, anthropology, botany, psychology)"?
These results suggest that students do not have to accept evolution as a valid scientific theory in order to understand the theory itself.
Two other studies investigated teachers' views of evolution as a valid scientific theory during a preservice teacher course.
However, we argue that developing acceptance of evolution as a valid scientific theory is an appropriate goal for future K-12 science teachers.
The low percentage of U.S. citizens that accept evolution as a valid scientific theory (Miller et al. 2006) suggests that U.S. education systems are not adequately representing and teaching this well-established theory to students.
In a study by Winslow et al. (2011), Christian college students with biology-related majors were eventually able to reconcile these different ways of knowing, and therefore could accept evolution as a valid scientific theory.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com