Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(9)
Interest in restoring Brontosaurus as a valid genus has remained since Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus were merged into one.
They concluded that the differences between Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus were numerous enough to reinstate the latter as a valid genus.
Interest in restoring Brontosaurus as a valid genus had continued since the time that Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus were merged into one.
The researchers concluded that the differences between Apatosaurus and Brontosaurus were numerous enough to warrant reinstating the latter as a valid genus.
A comprehensive study of one branch of the dinosaur family tree resurrects Brontosaurus as a valid genus.
Although the new genus Chorioactis was proposed to accommodate the unique species a few years after its original discovery, it was not until 1968 that it was accepted as a valid genus.
Similar(51)
This name is not a valid genus as it was not associated with a valid nominal species.
Some scientists do not believe that Sigilmassasaurus is a valid genus.
Currently, Indraloris is considered to be a valid genus within the family Sivaladapidae, containing two named species: I. himalayensis from India and I. kamlialensis from Pakistan.
We conclude that Sinocastor is a valid genus.
Later [11] showed that Isorropodon Sturany, 1896 is a valid genus of Vesicomyidae, and [36] transferred to the family the genus Adulomya.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com