The phrase "as a strong proof" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when you want to emphasize the robustness or reliability of evidence or an argument in a discussion or analysis.
Example: "The results of the experiment serve as a strong proof of the theory we proposed."
Alternatives: "as compelling evidence" or "as solid evidence".
To those advocating reliance on them, Washington responded: "The Idea is chimerical, and that we have so long persisted in it is a reflection on the judgment of a Nation so enlightened as we are, as well as a strong proof of the empire of prejudice over reason".
Sunrise Strategic Partners, which funded several better-for-you sweets and snack brands including Little Secrets, Perky Jerky and Kodiak Cakes, also notes it is looking to invest in companies that have an average annual revenue between $10 million and $25 million, as well as a strong proof of concept and a high appeal to millennials.
The initiative covers unmet medical needs such as malaria and tuberculosis as well as orphan drugs and ideas that need a strong proof of concept.
A strong proof point to this claim is the education system.
This study provides a strong proof of principle that 5a is feasible to be further developed as a novel multitarget anticancer drug for human breast cancer.
A strong proof-of-concept for a construction protocell would change the game.
Following work by Schütte, it was later shown by W. Tait and D. Prawitz that indeed the cut-elimination property holds (the proof of this has to use a stronger proof theoretic principle, as it should be according to the incompletness theorem).
The highly encouraging results from this comprehensive evaluation of antiretroviral PrEP efficacy serve as strong proof of principle for this approach and have major implications for the continued planning and implementation of future and current PrEP studies.
Therefore, strictly speaking, our results have to be interpreted as a strong indication rather than a proof.
John Dowd – the former federal prosecutor who investigated Rose for Major League Baseball in 1989 – felt he had strong proof that Rose had bet on his own games as a player.
The release of 36HCl+ and 39K+ as well as 74KCl+ showed a strong correlation which proofed a recently proposed capture mechanism.
