The phrase "as a standard implementation" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a typical or commonly accepted way of executing a process or system.
Example: "The software is designed to function as a standard implementation, ensuring compatibility across various platforms."
Alternatives: "as a typical implementation" or "as a conventional implementation."
As the standard implementation in 3GPP LTE [32,33] presents, the BS is configured with 4 with antennas, i.e., N r = 4, and each user is configured with 2 antennas, i.e., N t = 2.
The execution speed of the two parallel algorithms is compared, on functions which are typically used as benchmarks for PSO, with a standard sequential implementation of PSO (SPSO), as well as with recently published results of other parallel implementations.
In the former test, we treat EGP as a 2-state dummy variable using standard implementation of independent contrasts (Midford et al. 2005).
For example, with 100,000 sequences, we need to compute approximately 5 billion distances to construct a complete distance matrix as needed by standard implementations of Neighbor-Joining [ 11] or UPGMA [ 12].
Although the delirium assessment instruments have often been used in research, the implementation as a standard medical or nursing screening tool has just started in clinical practice.
TME has since its implementation as a standard operative procedure significantly improved overall 5-year survival, with the greatest improvement observed for stage III patients [ 35].
This form was adapted in Malawi based on a similar form developed by WHO as a standard part of IMCI training and implementation [ 36].
The results form a basis for future implementation of WGS as a standard typing tool for classification of E. coli in phylogeny and epidemiology.
Here, we will have a brief look at how E. coli is currently classified, how it fits our data, and discuss how these results may form a basis for future implementation of WGS as a standard typing tool for classification of E. coli in phylogeny and epidemiology and understanding E. coli evolution.
Since the comparison with [3] was impossible due to its abstruse presentation of update equations we compare our proposed modified version with standard implementation of PSO (as in (11)) in terms of computational complexity, fidelity, and robustness against noise.
