Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
as a standard for comparison
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "as a standard for comparison" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a benchmark or reference point against which other items or data can be evaluated. Example: "We will use the previous year's sales figures as a standard for comparison to assess our current performance."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(13)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
16 human-written examples
Temephos H at 0.1 ppm (commercial concentration) was used as a standard for comparison.
Science
Manuka honey was used as a standard for comparison because it has been extensively studied.
Science
Hence, pulsed ultrasound disinfection of natural water was thoroughly investigated in this study along with continuous ultrasound as a standard for comparison.
Science
Manuka honey from the manuka tree (Lepto-spermum scoparium), a native of New Zealand has been used as a standard for comparison in the present study.
Science
With these separated particles, two new blends of HIPS-type material with narrow particle distributions were reconstituted using commercial grade Lustrex HH-104 PS, together with a reconstituted blend of HIPS made up of the original broad particle-size distribution to be used as a standard for comparison.
Science
The group is split into two equal subgroups, one of which remains unchanged and is used as a standard for comparison.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
44 human-written examples
Lysozyme, also known as muramidase, is a well-known endolysin enzyme that is generally used as a standard for comparisons of endolysin activity.
Science
Cy5 was used as a standard for multigel comparison.
Science
The Cy5 CyDye labeled eye lysate was used as a standard for multigel comparison.
Science
Bone marrow-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs) are considered the best cell source and taken as a standard for the comparison of MSCs from other sources.
Science
A template depicts a typical structural pattern and serves as a standard for BAS comparisons.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "as a standard for comparison", ensure the chosen standard is well-defined, relevant, and consistently applied to avoid skewing results or introducing bias.
Common error
Avoid assuming that a "standard for comparison" is universally applicable. A standard relevant in one context may be inappropriate or misleading in another. Always justify the selection of your standard.
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "as a standard for comparison" functions as an adverbial phrase modifying a verb, indicating the purpose or method used in an evaluation. Ludwig AI shows that it is frequently used to establish a reference point for assessing or judging something else. For example, "Manuka honey was used as a standard for comparison because it has been extensively studied."
Frequent in
Science
94%
Encyclopedias
4%
Formal & Business
2%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Reference
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "as a standard for comparison" is a common and grammatically correct phrase, predominantly used in scientific and academic writing to denote a benchmark against which other items are evaluated. As evidenced by Ludwig, it serves to establish a clear and objective basis for assessment. Consider alternatives like "as a benchmark for assessment" or "as a reference point for evaluation" to add variety to your writing. When employing this phrase, ensure the "standard" is well-defined and relevant to maintain rigor and avoid potential bias. Ludwig AI validates the correctness and utility of this phrase, underscoring its importance in precise and objective evaluation.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
as a benchmark for assessment
Replaces "standard" with "benchmark", emphasizing the role as a point of reference for evaluation.
as a reference point for evaluation
Substitutes "standard" with "reference point", highlighting its function as a basis for judging value.
to serve as a comparative baseline
Emphasizes the use of a baseline for comparison, implying a foundation to measure against.
utilized as a basis for comparison
Uses "basis" replacing "standard", highlighting its function as an underlying foundation or support.
for comparative purposes
Focuses on the intention of comparing, rather than the specific item used as a standard.
against which to measure performance
Focuses on the action of measuring performance relative to a set criterion.
as a control for evaluating results
Highlights the role of a control group or variable in assessing outcomes.
for standardization of evaluation
Focuses on the procedure and the standardization to have a common evaluation.
as a gauge for assessment
Uses "gauge" to indicate measure for evaluation.
as the yardstick for measuring progress
Uses "yardstick" as a metaphor for a standard unit of measurement of progress.
FAQs
How can I use "as a standard for comparison" in a sentence?
Use "as a standard for comparison" to indicate a benchmark against which other things are measured or evaluated. For example: "We used last year's performance data as a standard for comparison to assess this year's results."
What are some alternatives to "as a standard for comparison"?
You can use phrases like "as a benchmark for assessment", "as a reference point for evaluation", or "for comparative purposes".
What makes a good "standard for comparison"?
A good "standard for comparison" should be relevant, reliable, and consistently measurable. It should also be appropriate for the context in which it's being used.
Is it always necessary to have "as a standard for comparison" in research?
While not always explicitly stated, having a "standard for comparison" is crucial for valid research. It allows for meaningful evaluation and interpretation of results, ensuring that findings can be contextualized and understood effectively.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested