Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "as a single spike" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are describing a singular occurrence or representation of a spike, often in data analysis or scientific discussions.
Example: "The data showed a significant increase in activity, represented as a single spike on the graph."
Alternatives: "as one spike" or "as a solitary spike".
Exact(3)
These are considered as a single spike).
Thus, the peri-stimulus time histogram reduces temporal precision through binning, and the central spike train removes trial-to-trial structure by representing the collection as a single spike train.
To avoid double recording, spikes separated by less than 2 ms, occurring in different roots of the same side, were counted as a single spike in the network firing rate.
Similar(57)
After a single spike, as seen in Fig. 12b, the corresponding trajectory remains to the right of the threshold manifold.
In our recordings, a small medium AHP (mAHP) can be observed following a single spike, as shown in the mean traces plotted in Fig. 3A.
The classic, biphasic STDP profile emerges as a spatial average over many synapses presented with a single spike pair or as a temporal average over a single synapse presented with many spike pairs.
From the figures, e.g. Figure 3C it looks as if there is sometimes only a single spike response in some of the conditions.
The adaptation variable then acts as a slow time scale, such that a single spike has a long-lasting effect on the adaptation variable (Fig. 2B).
A single spike was defined as a sharp discharge at least twice the background amplitude and <100 milliseconds in duration.
On the contrary, they found that endocytosis was slow after a single spike, and accelerated as the number of action potentials increased to 25.
Rather, a single spike was followed by a larger afterdepolarizing potential (ADP) as gCaT was increased.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com