The phrase "as a quality criterion" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing standards or benchmarks for evaluating the quality of something.
Example: "We will assess the product's performance as a quality criterion before making our final decision."
Alternatives: "as a standard for quality" or "as a measure of quality".
In this paper, it is recommended that the time required to detect a fire and warn people about it in the tunnel be used as a quality criterion since it has a direct effect on the probability of saving lives.
The performance of the segmentation scheme was determined as a quality criterion to evaluate the number of images approved, that is, those which, according to the evaluation method used, were correctly segmented by the system.
Thus, we use closeness of to 0 as a quality criterion for the choice of the parameter in Phase 3, as it will be shown in the following section and in Figure 6.
The issue of incomplete data was addressed in the analysis of the method of derivation or validation, and as such was not included as a quality criterion.
Blinding of therapists and participants is not feasible when applying physical activity interventions, and hence, item 14 was not retained as a quality criterion.
The importance of an empathetic respectful manner as a quality criterion is found in other studies, although they were not exclusively about day care.
RNA concentration was quantified by a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Wilmington, DE, USA) and quality was assessed using the Agilent Bioanalyzer (Foster City, CA, USA) for which RNA integrity number of >7 was used as a quality criteria.
This study introduces and tests a quality criterion for time trends referred to as statistical meaningfulness, which is a stricter quality criterion for trends than high statistical significance.
Statistical meaningfulness is intended as a complementary quality criterion together with high statistical significance as a basis and support for discussions regarding how a certain time trend should be classified, treated and reported.
Regular assessment of pain and other symptoms was rated as a valid quality criterion, though it was commented that a validated instrument might not always be available, particularly for specific patient groups (e.g. for persons with advanced dementia).
In the case of an MP3 coder, the output noise power metric cannot be used directly as a compression quality criterion.
