The phrase "as a consequence of interference" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to explain the result or effect of interference in a particular situation or context.
Example: "The experiment yielded unexpected results as a consequence of interference from external factors."
Alternatives: "due to interference" or "as a result of interference."
Hawley et al. [ 44] reported that resveratrol-induced AMPK activation in isogenic cell lines, stably expressing AMPK complexes containing AMP-insensitive γ2 subunit variants (R531G), derives from an AMP/ATP imbalance as a consequence of interference with mitochondrial respiration.
Oxidative stress also belongs to Cd-induced plant cell responses as a consequence of interference with antioxidant enzymes and depletion of antioxidant molecules [ 4], which may result in oxidative damages to phospholipid membranes, proteins and DNA [ 5, 6].
Finally, some flickering of the cones may be appreciated in the videos that may be a consequence of interferences or reflective changes as well as changes in the coupling efficiency between the incident light and the cones for each raster scan [ 14].
These results can be explained as a special instance of the redundancy effect as well as a consequence of processing interference within visuo-spatial working memory.
However, resonance-like peaks might appear as a consequence of phase interference phenomena between consecutive transient responses.
It is also possible that genes become silenced as a consequence of transcription interference (Martens et al, 2004; Hongay et al, 2006).
As a consequence of the inter-cell interference coordination (ICIC) efforts of Release 10, the downlink (DL) pilot signals might experience an enhancement in their resiliency against jamming.
Females had higher recombination rate than males as a consequence of differences in crossover interference and regional variation of sex specific rates along the chromosome.
And Facebook linked these accounts to Russia as a consequence of its investigation into Kremlin interference in the wake of the 2016 US presidential election.
Discrete, one-time sampling may not only fail to record some seasonally occurring forms, but also give little information about changes in the species composition, including local extinction, over time as a consequence of natural events or human interference.
Whether this occurs as a consequence of its interaction with microtubules or interference with phosphorylation/dephosphorylation events is yet to be determined.
