The phrase "as a collusion of" is not correct in standard written English.
The term "collusion" typically refers to a secret agreement or cooperation between parties for illegal or deceitful purposes, and it is not commonly used in the context implied by the phrase.
Example: "The investigation revealed that the actions taken were not merely a collusion of interests, but rather a deliberate attempt to mislead the public."
Alternatives: "as a combination of" or "as a collaboration of".
Farrow attacked the media for what he portrayed as a collusion to silence victims of sexual abuse while offering a voice to perpetrators.
Creating the social and political space for groups fighting against fundamentalism is nearly impossible given the restrictions on freedom of expression and assembly, as well as by the collusion of many governments, such as that of Pakistan, with fundamentalist groups.
WASHINGTON, Aug 29 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the U.S. Supreme Court chief justice should tell the head of a national security court to question FBI and Justice Department officials about their use of a so-called Russia dossier as part of a collusion probe.
Jonathan D. Reich Lakeland, Fla., June 23 , 2009 To the Editor: Tony Judt provides a realistic assessment of both the illegality of settlements in international law as well as the collusion of Israeli governments of all tendencies to support them.
Rather than driven by the intense desire to covet someone else's wife, it looks like he just wanted to protest what he saw as the unconstitutional collusion of church and state.
Photographing as a Need The Long Collusion of Photography and Crime George Steinmetz, Aerial Photographer Starbucks and the Issue of White Space Seven Signs that Your Man's Masculinity Is Nontoxic John McCain, Honor, and Self-Reflection Subscribe to The New Yorkerfor only $1 a week.Plus, get a free tote.
That wages do not fall to levels that might, according to orthodox theory, eliminate unemployment is explained by insider outsider theorists as a reflection of collusion between self-interested parties in particular, those possessing jobs.
The reader's amazing tolerance (which he would extend to no novel written half as badly as most biographies) makes sense only when seen as a kind of collusion between him and the biographer in an excitingly forbidden undertaking: tiptoeing down the corridor together, to stand in front of the bedroom door and try to peep through the keyhole.
As a web of collusion emerges between the American-backed militia and the local Taliban that sporadically wreaks havoc on the village, the elder's attempt at isolationism seems not a cop-out, but the better of three evils.
The Lysenko story serves as a powerful warning against the collusion of ideology and science, a threat that is very much with us today.
