The phrase "artificial divergence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing differences or variations that are created or influenced by artificial means, such as technology or design.
Example: "The study focused on the effects of artificial divergence in machine learning algorithms, highlighting how they can lead to unexpected outcomes."
Alternatives: "synthetic variation" or "manufactured divergence".
At generation 19 of artificial selection, divergence in intrinsic aerobic capacity as measured by run time to exhaustion was significant, with a 436% difference between high capacity runners (HCR) and low capacity runners (LCR).
It is plausible then that artificial selection and breed divergence, which operates through the same mechanisms as evolution, affects also spermatogenesis.
Derived from Eurasian gray wolves, domestication began over 14 000 years ago, and much more recently dogs have undergone an intense period of artificial selection generating phenomenal phenotypic divergence among the more than 400 breeds (Akey et al. 2010).
This hypothesis is of particular interest in closely related members of the Bovini tribe, because domestication has promoted rapid phenotypic divergence through strong artificial selection of some species while others remain undomesticated.
In the divergence constraint equation, an artificial compressibility term (time derivative of the pressure with a small parameter) is added and the first order terms are expressed in a divergence form, and are discretized by utilizing the Lax Friedrichs numerical fluxes.
As an alternative, one might argue that the two shared traits associated with small size in dogs may reflect convergence as a result of artificial selection for size rather than divergence from a single common ancestor in the Middle East.
Artificial selection is discussed, and the wide divergence of opinion as to what might constitute an architectural configuration illustrated.
In order to support the theoretical results in this work, in the upcoming section we study as an example a simple velocity field with a non-vanishing divergence and visualize the according artificial viscosities for the two presented cases.
Although these results do not preclude more widespread historical introgression, current levels of gene flow are too low to prevent genetic divergence, especially when driven by artificial selection.
The differences between species indicate possible effects of selective sweeps before domestication (GHR in pigs) or before species divergence (GHR in Bison), directional (artificial) selection (PRLR in pigs) or functional switching (GHR in cattle, PRLR).
