The phrase "artificial conflict" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation or disagreement that is not genuine or is created for a specific purpose, often in discussions about media, politics, or social issues.
Example: "The debate over the new policy was largely an artificial conflict, designed to distract from more pressing issues."
Alternatives: "manufactured dispute" or "contrived disagreement".
We adhere to a classic definition of a game, that it is "a system in which players engage in an artificial conflict defined by rules, that results in a quantifiable outcome" (Salen & Zimmerman, 2004).
Third, a less artificial conflict set-up, in which territory ownership was asymmetrical and opponents were allowed to see each other before the conflict, resulted in shorter interactions with reduced escalation phases.
"Our main aim is to leave behind the artificial conflicts that have been artificially imposed on this amazing society," Saakashvili said after his appointment.
Such spaces improve efficiency through avoiding artificial conflicts, improving design flexibility, enhancing change management and assisting conflict resolution.
Such errors could give rise to artificial conflicts across datasets.
"What this artificial generational conflict fails to recognise is that different generations are already helping out each other inside the family - whereas the real division in our society is between rich and poor".
While this option is necessarily biologically somewhat artificial (after all, conflict-free scenarios do not really exist except in truly special cases), our new 'no conflict' model does the requested job of entirely removing sexual conflict while retaining all other features of the original model.
Within the conventions of the French "well-made play" (with its social intrigues and artificial devices to resolve conflict), he employed his paradoxical, epigrammatic wit to create a form of comedy new to the 19th-century English theatre.
Shakey is introduced in the early pages of John Markoff's new book, "Machines of Loving Grace: The Quest for Common Ground Between Humans and Robots," as an example of an ongoing conflict between artificial intelligence and the linked but divergent project of intelligence augmentation.
An idea like OPS-USA that's a positive, uplifting, inclusive and solutions-focused concept about heroic journeys, would be seen as a glitch in the traditional world of reality based series which is focused on 'amping up' the arousal level of the audience through shocking them, creating conflict and artificial drama often humiliating and denigrating participants because they're not good enough.
A 'species phylogeny' of closely related taxa such as these at best provides an artificial consensus of multiple conflicting genealogical patterns, rather than a meaningful representation of actual lineage diversification.
