The phrase "artifacts of study" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in academic or research contexts to refer to items or data collected during a study or research project.
Example: "The artifacts of study included surveys, interviews, and observational data that provided insights into participant behavior."
Alternatives: "research artifacts" or "study materials".
In this way, we are in line with findings from the social studies of technology, but differ in that our artifact of study – software – is more "virtually immaterial" than machines which had been primarily earlier objects of study.
The greater Type II error rate on adjusted graphs could be an artifact of study design (i.e., participants did not know if baseline trend control had been applied), and the impact of MASAJ on Type II errors needs to be explored in detail prior to more widespread use of the method.
The Aβ diurnal pattern was noted in all sponsors' studies and was not an artifact of study design.
This is particularly true given that statistical significance at a given magnitude of effect is dependent on, or an artifact of, study design.
They show that paradoxical associations that have been found between a risk factor for disease and prognosis after disease-onset might in fact be reflecting true underlying biology rather than being an artifact of study design.
This discussion highlights the possibility that protein signaling changes previously ascribed to the insulin resistance disease process [ 84] may in fact be a refractory response to pharmaceutical medication and hence represent an artifact of study design.
The strong representation of physics departments is an artifact of studying SCALE-UP; the majority of secondary implementers are based in physics departments (Foote et al. 2014).
While these attributes would be highly desirable, there is no current data available to support either of these claims in humans, and recent studies imply that the beneficial effects on β-cell mass in part may be an artifact of studies in juvenile rodents (9– 11).
Hence, Alvarez-Alfageme et al. [8] concluded that the 'apparent harmful effects of Cry1Ab and CryBb1 reported by Schmidt et al. [1] were artifacts of poor study design and procedures' and 'false positives.' In Figure 1, we provide the comparative mortalities observed at the various Bt toxin concentrations in the two studies discussed here, and in Table 1, the relevant statistical values.
Therefore, the low rate of capture is an artifact of the study design and not an indication of the quality of the data or of the care this study setting provides.
