The phrase "articulated points" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to clearly expressed or well-defined ideas or arguments in a discussion or presentation.
Example: "During the meeting, she presented several articulated points that clarified the project's objectives."
Alternatives: "clearly defined points" or "well-expressed points".
Ms. de Larrocha played them cleanly and straightforwardly: there was nothing objectionable in her readings, but also not much in the way of a sharply articulated point of view.
Witness, for example, the recent refusal by the American Institute of Physics to adopt even basic uniform quality control standards for articles, such as requirements for clarity and an obviously articulated point.
What's missing from "Cronkite" is a coherent, sharply articulated point of view of the sort that makes Robert Caro's multi-volume biography of LBJ so stimulating, albeit sometimes maddening.
The cello, he added, must also be the "rhythmic monitor" of a quartet by "setting the pulse, articulating points of rhythmic stress, conveying a sense of rhythmic direction".
In private counseling sessions, he has heard a lot of venting and obsessing, and he has learned that the famously anxious freshman year is only "one of the major, articulating points in one's life".
As Roof struggled to articulate points in the first part of jury selection last week and took on a largely passive role, the judge would not allow his standby counsel to make objections.
On what he called the worst day of his political life, Senator Al Franken articulated two points that are central to understanding what has become known as the #MeToo moment.
NYT comments give readers more room to marshal facts and articulate points of view, and many of them ring with real authority.
CIA analysts and experts on Iran within the government said it also could be interpreted as an attempt to articulate points for possible discussion with Washington.
Indeed, the California Supreme Court made only a glancing citation to Kyles v. Whitley, the key U.S. Supreme Court case that articulated this point about imputed knowledge.
Walter Krämer, the president of the society, articulated this point of view when he lambasted the Duden for including Anglicisms commonly used by "braggers" — what in previous generations might have been called yuppies.
