The phrase "articulated explicitly" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to something that has been clearly and directly expressed or stated.
Example: "The terms of the agreement were articulated explicitly in the contract to avoid any misunderstandings."
Alternatives: "stated clearly" or "expressed directly".
These plans were articulated explicitly at the Bucharest Nato summit of April 2008, when Georgia and Ukraine were promised eventual membership in Nato.
Uber's technological and management problems — and their tragic consequences for a 49-year-old woman pushing a bike across a dark boulevard in Tempe — had presented policymakers and the broader self-driving industry with an almost perfect test case for an idea that is rarely articulated explicitly but hovers just beneath the surface for some advocates of driverless vehicles.
Just as the scientific definition doesn't touch on the issue of our common practice of correctly locating pains in healthy body parts, the common sense would probably draw a blank if the problem were articulated explicitly and the question is pressed really hard.
The effect of the November 20 executive actions is to secure greater transparency by having enforcement policies articulated explicitly by high-level officials, including the president.
All model assumptions need to be articulated explicitly, their validity tested against the particulars of each trial.
However, the value of the qualitative research was rarely articulated explicitly by the authors of these articles.
More importantly, here we do not "know" what we "know" or, more exactly, our left hemispheres cannot articulate explicitly what our right hemispheres know implicitly.
At this stage, students focused more on the preferable futures, because they had challenges to articulate explicitly.
Second, motivated by a gathering movement to reconceptualize the legitimacy of administrative agencies in terms of their political and specifically, their presidential accountability, prominent administrative-law scholars advocate approaches to arbitrary-and-capricious review that would encourage or require agencies to articulate explicitly the political reasons for their actions.
By the age of 3, children are able to articulate explicitly a number of the differences between real and pretend noting, for instance, that a child with a real dog will be able to see and pet the dog, whereas a child with a pretend dog will not (Estes, Wellman and Wooley 1989; Harris 2000, chapters 2 and 4; Wellman and Estes 1986; see also Bouldin and Pratt 2001 and references therein).
Finally, departments may need to articulate explicitly what will constitute SFES scholarly activities whether these will be focused in basic science research, science education research, or both and how SFES scholarly activities are distinct from service activities.
