The phrase "articular angle" is not correct in written English; it seems to be a misspelling of "articular angle." You can use the correct term "articular angle" in contexts related to anatomy or geometry, specifically when discussing the angles formed by joints or bones.
Example: "The articular angle of the femur is crucial for understanding its movement in relation to the pelvis."
Alternatives: "joint angle" or "angle of articulation."
f, g, Box-and-whisker plots depicting comparisons of the articular angle a (f) and the dorsal canting angle α (g) of the proximal pedal phalanx CCH4.
The two most important radiographic measurements are the radial articular angle (RAA) and the carpal slip (CS).
GRs showed statistically significant greater articular angle, more acute superior gonial angle, and reduced mandibular dimensions (Co-Gn, S-Ar, Ar-Go, Go-Me) when compared to BRs.
Among the vertical measurements, articular angle (S^Ar^Go) showed significant reduced values in BR group (140.85 ± 4.22°) when compared to GR group (144.66° ± 4.81°).
Articular angle, superior gonial angle, and mandibular dimensions (Co-Gn, S-Ar, Ar-Go, Go-Me) showed significant differences in the comparison between groups.
Ulnar lengthening with or without excision of osteochondroma(s) improved range of motion of the forearm and elbow, wrist radial deviation, the forearm bone length discrepancy (levelling), radial bowing, radial articular angle and carpal slip of the forearm.
A cadaveric and radiographic study was undertaken to demonstrate the change in intersesamoidal crista architecture after an osteotomy that corrects the proximal articular set angle (PASA).
Radiographic parameters in 19 patients (34 feet) were compared and two distinct patterns were evident: 1) A proximal articular set angle greater than 15° was associated with complete crista erosion in 10 feet (91% of this subgroup); 2) a tibial sesamoid position greater than three was associated with partial or complete erosion in 17 feet (100% of this subgroup).
There are significant differences in articular eminence angle among the three malocclusion groups.
There are significant differences in articular eminence angle among the three malocclusion groups. .
For the articular eminence angle, there was a statistically significant (p < 0.001) difference between the three groups, and it was further observed that the class III group showed a smaller angle of eminence than the class II group.
