Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(42)
The remaining articles were evaluated by reading the full text independently.
Articles were evaluated by two authors, using pre-defined criteria for strength of design.
Articles were evaluated with the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool.
Finally, retrieved articles were evaluated and clinical recommendations for the treatment of neuropathic pain were designed by the pain specialists.
In the end, a total of 19 articles were evaluated to be relevant to this topic and included in this review.
These articles were evaluated independently for outcomes and quality of evidence using the Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation Scale and Sackett's Levels of Evidence.
Similar(18)
The quality of the extracted articles was evaluated using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies.
RP research projects Readings: students' understanding of the main concepts addressed in the articles was evaluated in every session with a one-question quiz.
Input articles are evaluated whether there are gene/protein names in the text.
The full text of the remaining 315 articles was evaluated for eligibility.
The full text of all selected articles was evaluated, and the references for each article were also screened to identify additional eligible papers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com