Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(21)
Articles were categorized and analyzed using descriptive quantitative measures and structured data matrices.
Data Extraction: Articles were categorized by type of evidence from I to V according to Sackett's rules of evidence.
The reviewed articles were categorized into three groups based on their research target(s): (1) intra-individual patterns of burnout symptoms (i.e., types of burnout) (42%), (2) intra-individual development of burnout over time (i.e., burnout trajectories) (33%), and (3) patterns of well-being indicators within individuals (i.e., well-being types) (33%).
In addition, articles were categorized being qualitative, quantitative or neither.
Articles were categorized as gender-neutral, women's health, or men's health.
In the data extraction, the articles were categorized in terms of their content and type.
Similar(39)
The articles are categorized based on the classification framework.
Based on a literature review the authors propose a classification of approaches to control underwater vehicles using NNs and the presented articles are categorized according to the identified categories.
Based on methodologies, the articles are categorized into conceptual, qualitative, quantitative, mixed and managerial categories.
Each of the 277 selected articles was categorized on four FCO dimensions (Aircraft technology & design, aviation operations & infrastructure, socioeconomic & policy measures, and alternate fuels & fuel properties).
One example was the work that has been undertaken in the Netherlands where articles are categorized on a scale that allows scoring the evidence using explicit criteria.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com