Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Full texts of the remaining articles were assessed on eligibility.
Articles were assessed on their strengths and limitations according to 3 sets of criteria: sample (A), analysis (B), and presentation (C) (Table 1).
Similar(58)
All articles were assessed for risks of bias on the basis of the criteria shown in Table 2.
In cases in which >1 article was published on the same study, all articles were assessed for data consistency.
Thirty-five articles were assessed for eligibility.
The full-text articles were assessed for eligibility independently.
The remaining 130 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility.
Articles were assessed for study quality.
Articles were assessed for methodological quality and risk-of-bias.
76 full text articles were assessed for eligibility.
In total, 141 full text articles were assessed for eligibility.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com