Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
More than 1000 articles were analysed and resulted in 122 papers.
References from bibliographies of identified articles were analysed and relevant citations were selected for review.
Following the preliminary search, the titles and abstracts of the articles were analysed and selected according to their suitability for this review.
Similar(57)
The articles were analysed between February and April in 2011 and again in the same period in 2012.
Relevant articles were analysed for eligibility, and further articles were identified from reference lists.
These 58 articles were analysed by topic, slant, and time period.
All scientific and newspaper articles were analysed on the content of full-text, except for scientific articles where the abstract information was regarded as sufficient for categorisation.
The articles were analysed one by one with the observation guide, and the most striking data is presented hereafter.
Titles and abstracts of retrieved references were screened for inclusion and full texts of potential articles were analysed for meeting the inclusion criteria.
The 13 articles were analysed according to four categories: overall findings; standards development; implementation issues; and impact of standards.
Newspaper articles were analysed for manifest content, 26 that is, what is explicitly stated and draws on the objective and replicable qualities of quantitative methods.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com