Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(25)
In a related study, 489 articles were analysed in three British newspapers.
531 articles were analysed from 48 countries.
In total, 33 articles were analysed.
Eligible articles were analysed using Stata®/SE software v.12.0.
These 58 articles were analysed by topic, slant, and time period.
Relevant articles were analysed for eligibility, and further articles were identified from reference lists.
Similar(35)
The identified articles are analysed using a qualitative content analysis technique, which leads to a coding scheme, including a main category, three sub-categories and several associated topics related to the main categories.
The content of the articles was analysed, interpreted and synthesised in light of the objectives of the review.
The strengths of our study include the large time span over which the articles were produced (11 years) and the wide search terms, leading to over 6000 articles being analysed.
All results presented in this article are analysed according to ITT.
The findings of this study are based on a total of 52 useable articles which were analysed to provide an overview on where and when these previous studies were published.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com