Suggestions(2)
Exact(1)
For each review identified during the eligibility assessment process, all relevant references were checked and added to the list of articles to be checked for eligibility, if not previously identified by the search strategy.
Similar(59)
The content of the article could be checked for legitimate sourcing – hyperlinks to the Associated Press or other whitelisted media organizations.
The bibliography of relevant articles have been checked to identify other significant papers.
References and citations of the articles identified were checked to ensure that all relevant articles were included.
Bibliographies of the articles obtained were checked to identify any studies not retrieved through the electronic databases.
Finally, the references of 'IMPF yes' articles were checked to identify any relevant articles previously missed.
The search strategy is shown in Appendix 1. Reference lists of identified articles and relevant review articles were checked for further possible studies.
In addition to the above electronic search, relevant articles were checked manually to identify additional potential papers.
In addition the references of retrieved articles were checked to identify any further studies.
The reference lists from relevant papers, especially from review articles, were checked to identify more studies unidentified in the original search.
Reference lists of relevant articles were checked to find potentially relevant publications that may have been overlooked by the electronic search.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com