The remaining articles were evaluated by reading the full text independently.
Articles were evaluated with the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool.
Articles were evaluated by two authors, using pre-defined criteria for strength of design.
The quality of the extracted articles was evaluated using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies.
Finally, retrieved articles were evaluated and clinical recommendations for the treatment of neuropathic pain were designed by the pain specialists.
RP research projects Readings: students' understanding of the main concepts addressed in the articles was evaluated in every session with a one-question quiz.
In the end, a total of 19 articles were evaluated to be relevant to this topic and included in this review.
For the present review, relevant articles were evaluated using an adapted version of the Effective Public Health Practice Project EPHPP Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studiesies' [12], as identified as a useful tool in the systematic review.
From 3086 articles 24 full text articles were evaluated, resulting in 7 included studies (5 RCTs, 2 pre-post studies) from 2 countries.
Pubmed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, Academic Search Premier and Web of Science were searched systematically; the 73 included articles were evaluated with the MMAT.
