Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(3)
Our findings establish that academic prominence of researchers (measured by citation counts) is not among the factors facilitating the decisions on articles inclusion.
The reviewed articles' inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) the setting was healthcare in general and the emergency department in particular; (2) the main focus was on teaching or evaluating multitasking, interruptions, or task switching; and (3) the article was available in the English language.
Of the responses given for a systematic review, mention of the following concepts was considered a correct answer: type of articles reviewed; databases searched; specific criteria for search; completeness of the search; inclusion/exclusion criteria for articles; inclusion of published and unpublished data; homogeneity assessment; meta-analysis was done.
Similar(57)
Disagreements were resolved by discussion and consensus for article inclusion and adjudicated by a third reviewer for the domain abstraction.
In other words, an article inclusion is dependent on whether it fits the overall objective of the review.
When there was disagreement about article inclusion, it was resolved by consensus.
Article inclusion criteria.
RB adjudicated any disagreements in article inclusion.
See figure 2 for flow chart process of article inclusion.
Table 1 summarises article inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Article inclusion was also evaluated by MK and SRH.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com