Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
No doubt that is why the technical articles are so successful.
The New Yorker, arriving weekly, is my biggest source of guilt, mainly because the articles are so good.
They really want to, because they have to prove that the Articles are so bad that of course this new Constitution is the perfect thing.
The articles are "So This is the University?" (1938), "The Offerings and Facilities in the Natural Sciences in the Liberal Arts Colleges" (1943), and "The Science Core in Liberal Education" (1952).
Rising Star articles are so designated on the top of its discussion page.
Similar(55)
After screening of the articles, we found the interventions in included articles were so varied in both the routes and doses of misoprostol that we could not carry out a direct comparison.
Moreover, the second round of journal articles was so much stronger (i.e., clear, balanced, etc). that, after the second week, I sent only a few emails to students who continued to be challenged in meeting expectations.
As the numbers of articles were so few, we decided to include all.
I didn't mind the narrow guidelines though since the articles were so out there to begin with.
If the people cited in your article are so concerned about the virulence of these parents, they could let the steam out of this issue by doing one simple thing: Open the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention database to independent analysis.
The sexist, hypocritical comments in the article are so numerous that were I to respond to them individually, I would have my own response article.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com