Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
First, the articles are assessed according to descriptive criteria such as journal, year of publication and research design applied.
Notice that the definition of the p-value associated with a pair of articles in terms of the hypergeometric null model provided in Eq. (2) does not depend on the order in which two articles are assessed.
Similar(58)
In total, 25 articles were assessed in full, with 6 being excluded following full assessment.
Articles were assessed against predefined inclusion criteria.
1416 articles were assessed and 32 articles included.
The articles were assessed for quality using the MMAT and AACODS checklist.
All articles were assessed for relevancy before inclusion into this review.
The original search of databases from inception to 2012 identified 11,046 abstracts after removal of duplicates,7 from which eight full text articles were assessed.
The whole articles were assessed for method quality by using the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group method quality criteria.
Thirty-five articles were assessed for eligibility.
The full text of the remaining 82 articles was assessed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com