The phrase "articles accounted for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the total or inventory of articles, often in reports or analyses.
Example: "After reviewing the inventory, we found that all articles accounted for were in good condition."
Alternatives: "items tallied" or "articles included".
AOL Time Warner said that all examples cited in the newspaper articles accounted for less than 2percentt of America Online's revenue.
It noted that while open access articles accounted for only 3% in 2014, they made up 8% of all articles published in 2017.
Our review results revealed that majority of the articles were focused on technology: Technology focused articles made up more than half of all the clusters, whereas managerial articles accounted for only 32% of all clusters.
The increase in empirical articles accounted for a substantial share of the growth in coauthored articles, and the correlation between coauthorship and empiricism persisted after controlling for numerous other influences.
Each of these articles accounted for a mean of $392,582 in direct costs (SD $423,256).
In the immunology group, a median of 18% (IQR 15 21) of a journals articles accounted for 50% of all citations to that journal.
Yet a search of the database Nexis shows that those posthumous articles account for almost a third of the coverage she received from major newspapers in the last 20 years.
Therefore, 3% of the articles account for 54% of the total number of times that costs were mentioned.
Furthermore, the citation impact of scientific articles is highly uneven, even within the same journal, following a log-normal distribution where 20% of articles account for 80% citations (the "20/80 law") [3].
Two-author articles account for 16.88% (of all articles) and articles with two or more authors for 11.61%.
As shown in Table 8, we find that most of the articles (96%) have <30 curated mutations in COSMIC; these articles account for <20% of the curated mutations.
