Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Abstracts of each article were reviewed by two authors (FD and LJW) to determine eligibility.
If they met initial inclusion criteria both abstract and full text article were reviewed to ascertain whether all inclusion criteria were met.
Only the discussion and conclusion sections of the article were reviewed for the extraction of subjective information, because it is in these sections that authors discuss the implications of their research.
Similar(57)
Reviewers: This article was reviewed by Mark Little and Glen Webb.
Reviewers This article was reviewed by Dr Andrew Clark.
Reviewers: this article was reviewed by Dan Graur, Eugene V. Koonin and Jürgen Brosius.
Reviewers: This article was reviewed by L. Aravind and Frank Eisenhaber.
The article was reviewed and revised by another researcher (S.M.).
This article was reviewed by Erik van Nimwegen.
The article was reviewed by all authors.
This article was reviewed by John Logsdon and Manyuan Long.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com