article was revised by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "article was revised by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that a specific article has undergone changes or updates made by a particular person or group. Example: "The article was revised by the editorial team to ensure accuracy and clarity before publication."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

This article was revised by William Martin, Arcady Mushegian and Eugene V. Koonin.

Biology Direct

The article was revised by MA, PK, RTC, H and JC.

Annals of Intensive Care

The article was revised by a professional translator, Irving Bernstein, PhD, Bernstein Delambre 3161447 Canada Inc. 3690 Saint-Laurent Boulevard, Montréal, QC H2X 2V4, CANADA.

BMC Health Services Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

After peer review the articles were revised by the authors and updated if necessary.

Health Research Policy and Systems

J-LV drafted the article, which was revised by JAK, AS, and MGM for critical content.

Critical Care

MP, FT and PM drafted the article, which was revised by PV, PB, SR, CV, PG, VM, DW, FT, and PM.

BMC Psychiatry

The drafts of this article were revised critically by all authors.

BMC Health Services Research

PW prepared the first draft of the article, which has been revised by CS, BF and TMD.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

PV and IH drafted the article, which was revised for important intellectual content by all authors.

BMC Medical Education

The first draft of this article was composed by SD, and was revised critically by all authors.

BMC Family Practice

The first draft of this article was composed by ELYW and was revised critically by all authors.

BMC Health Services Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When attributing revisions, be specific about the nature of the revisions and the expertise of the reviser to enhance credibility.

Common error

Avoid simply stating that the "article was revised by" someone without indicating their qualifications or the scope of their revisions. Provide context to demonstrate the value of the revision.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "article was revised by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the article underwent a process of modification or improvement carried out by a specific individual or group. Ludwig provides examples demonstrating its use in attributing revisions in academic and encyclopedic contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

50%

Encyclopedias

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

News & Media

5%

Academia

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "article was revised by" is a grammatically sound and commonly used passive construction that serves to credit those who have modified or updated an article. Ludwig confirms its correctness and appropriateness in various contexts, especially within scientific and encyclopedic sources. While generally formal, its specific meaning can be enhanced by providing details about the nature of revisions and the reviser's expertise. Alternatives such as "article was edited by" or "article was updated by" may offer nuanced distinctions depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

article was edited by

Focuses specifically on editing for grammar and style.

article was updated by

Highlights the addition of new information or changes to reflect current data.

article was reviewed by

Emphasizes the assessment and feedback process prior to potential changes.

article was proofread by

Focuses on the correction of errors in spelling and punctuation.

article was amended by

Highlights the correction or improvement of the article through formal changes.

article was rewritten by

Suggests a more substantial change involving a complete re-drafting of the content.

revisions to the article were made by

Shifts the focus to the revisions themselves rather than the act of revising.

article was modified by

Indicates a general change or alteration to the article.

article was corrected by

Focuses on fixing errors or inaccuracies in the article.

article was adapted by

Suggests the article was changed to suit a different purpose or audience.

FAQs

How can I phrase the sentence "article was revised by" more actively?

You can rephrase it actively as "[Name] revised the article" or "[Name] made revisions to the article."

What's the difference between "article was edited by" and "article was revised by"?

"Article was edited by" typically refers to changes made for clarity, grammar, and style, while "article was revised by" suggests more substantial alterations, including content updates or structural changes.

Is it appropriate to use "article was revised by" in academic writing?

Yes, "article was revised by" is appropriate for academic writing, especially when acknowledging contributions to a published work. Ensure accurate and specific attribution.

What are some alternative phrases to "article was revised by"?

Alternatives include "article was updated by", "article was amended by", or "article was modified by", each implying slightly different changes to the article.