Suggestions(1)
Exact(32)
The data for this article was retrieved from publicly available sources.
Forty-six articles met our inclusion criteria, one article was retrieved from the references of a selected article, and one article was retrieved from a hand search.
A full-text article was retrieved for any citation deemed relevant by any of the reviewers.
If eligibility could not be determined, the full article was retrieved and the methods screened.
The full text article was retrieved if either reviewer considered the citation potentially relevant.
Where information was not sufficient, the full article was retrieved for review.
Similar(28)
The full text of 15 relevant articles was retrieved.
Full-text articles were retrieved afterward.
All potentially relevant articles were retrieved and reviewed.
Altogether 56 articles were retrieved from the Scopus database.
Abstracts of relevant articles were reviewed independently using predetermined criteria, and appropriate articles were retrieved.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com