Suggestions(2)
Exact(8)
To his dismay the article was rejected, ironically by an editor at Cern.
If your article was rejected, it is still useful to analyse feedback, work out why and revise it for somewhere else.
One article was rejected based on criteria 3 to 6 and also because the target group was not radiographers (n = 1).
But if your article was rejected because the editors or referees judged it unsuitable or not novel enough for their journal, you may want to submit it intact without revision to a more suitable journal.
Reasons for rejection at the evaluation of full text level involved a low reporting quality not satisfying the evaluation criteria mentioned in Table 2: one article was rejected based on criteria 1 and 8, two based on criteria 7 and 10, and also due to the focus on the technical performance of devices only or patient satisfaction only.
When an article was rejected, it was replaced by the following article in the list.
Similar(52)
A common reason for articles being rejected after peer review is this lack of context or lack of clarity about why the research is important.
According to the exclusion criteria, 210 articles were rejected.
Therefore, a total of fourteen (14) articles were rejected with only seventeen (17) studies used.
The discussion goes on until the reviewers decide unanimously either to accept or reject the paper; articles are rejected only if the reviewers find them to contain mistakes that authors are unable or unwilling to fix.
I publish a medium sized website and routinely encounter rank amateurs who declare that their freedom of speech is violated if their poorly written articles are rejected.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com