article was previously issued

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "article was previously issued" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to an article that has been published or distributed before a certain point in time. Example: "The article was previously issued in the journal last year, and it has now been updated with new findings."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

A version of this article was previously published on Eyewoke.

The Guardian

A version of this article was previously published here.

The Guardian - Opinion

This is an extract of a longer article was previously published here.

The Guardian

This article was previously published on Guardian Students on 8 January 2014.

The Guardian

This article was previously published at NK News, an independent North Korea News service.

The Guardian

A version of this article was previously published on Guardian Students on 27 February 2012.

The Guardian

This article was previously published on CarpoolGoddess.com.

Huffington Post

This article was previously published on LetMeStartBySayingBlog.com.

Huffington Post

This article was previously posted on BET.com.

Huffington Post

This article was previously posted on michellemcquaid.com.

Huffington Post

This article was previously published on Brooklyn Street Art.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating that an article has been published before, consider the context and choose the most appropriate synonym for "issued", such as "published" or "released".

Common error

Avoid using excessive passive voice constructions. While "article was previously issued" is grammatically correct, active voice alternatives like "the journal previously issued the article" can be more direct and engaging.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "article was previously issued" functions as a statement indicating the prior release or distribution of a particular article. Given that Ludwig AI describes the phrase as correct but potentially uncommon, it is grammatically functional but may not be the most preferred choice.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "article was previously issued" is grammatically correct but considered relatively uncommon. Ludwig indicates it's usable, but directness may be improved using similar alternatives. Due to its formality, it is more appropriate for formal or technical writing. Consider using alternatives like "article was published earlier" for general contexts. The absence of real-world examples suggests the phrase's rarity, emphasizing the importance of context-aware and common phrasing when writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

article was published earlier

Changes the tense and uses "earlier" instead of "previously issued".

article was released before

Replaces "issued" with "released" and uses "before" instead of "previously".

article appeared previously

Uses "appeared" to indicate publication and retains "previously".

article has been previously published

Employs the present perfect tense and replaces "issued" with "published".

article saw prior publication

Uses a more formal tone with "saw prior publication" instead of "was previously issued".

article was circulated before

Substitutes "issued" with "circulated" to imply distribution.

article was distributed earlier

Uses "distributed" in place of "issued" to convey dissemination.

article was available previously

Shifts focus to availability rather than issuance.

article has previously come out

Uses the phrasal verb "come out" to indicate release.

article existed in prior publications

Expresses the idea of prior existence in other publications.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "article was previously issued"?

You can use alternatives like "article was published earlier", "article was released before", or "article appeared previously depending on the context.

Is "article was previously issued" grammatically correct?

Yes, the phrase "article was previously issued" is grammatically correct, but it might not be the most common or natural way to express the idea that an article has been published before. Consider more common alternatives for clarity.

In what contexts is "article was previously issued" suitable?

The phrase "article was previously issued" could be suitable in formal writing or technical contexts where precision is important. However, in more general writing, alternatives like "article was published before" may be preferred.

What's the difference between "article was previously issued" and "article was previously published"?

"Issued" implies a formal release or distribution, while "published" generally refers to making content available to the public. The phrase "article was previously published" is often a more common and widely understood alternative.