The phrase "article study design" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the specific design or methodology of a study presented in an article, particularly in academic or research contexts.
Example: "The article study design employed a randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of the new treatment."
Alternatives: "research article methodology" or "study design in the article".
The following data were abstracted from each article: study design, method of data collection, clinical setting, population characteristics, method of analysis, risk factors reported, outcome (types and definitions of IFD) and strength of association demonstrated.
The following information is extracted from each article: study design, mean age, proportion of men and women, diagnosis, co-morbidity, illness duration, illness severity, age of illness onset (in years), number of illness episodes, sample size, ECT description, total number of ECT sessions, comparator group characteristics, length of follow-up, treatment modality and cognitive outcomes.
Two investigators (PMH and MO) independently extracted the following information from each eligible article: study design (including patient selection and treatment allocation), population, clinical setting, dosage and duration of fenoldopam treatment, incidence of new AKI, requirement for RRT, hospital mortality and reported complications.
We extracted the following data from the included articles: study design, participant information, interventions and setting, follow-up period and outcome data [ 42].
The manuscripts of 40 articles were retrieved and eight were excluded (publication type/forum: dissertation, report published in a non-peer-reviewed journal, and two French-language articles; study design: patient record research and age; children and adolescent included).
From each article, the study design, sample size, age range, years of follow-up or type of control sample (depending on study design), type of physical activity and results were abstracted.
Table 1 summarises the reviewed articles by study design and participant numbers.
Fifty-four (68.4 %) studies were prospective and 23 (29.1 %) retrospective; in 2 (2.5 %) articles the study design was not reported.
Table 1 lists characteristics of included primary research articles with study design, population and intervention characteristics, results and risk-of-bias [ 24] summary scores.
This article studies the design of rules for the creation of CBNRM governance bodies.
This article describes the study design, the study outcomes, and the key issues.
