Exact(7)
Two authors worked in pairs to abstract study characteristics independently for each article selected for inclusion.
Even when an author has not had their article selected for publication, they have been grateful for the experience and the opportunity to receive feedback. Et Seq.: Have any of the other member journals (http://www.legalpeerreview.org/members.php) published issues using the service?
Two authors (EGK, ZY) extracted information from each article selected for inclusion including the number of cases and non-cases, study design and population, measurement of WBC and diagnosis of T2D, effect estimate and 95% confidence intervals for associations between WBC, neutrophil/granulocyte, lymphocyte and monocyte count and T2D risk.
The level of evidence was classified for each article selected for inclusion in the review [ 9].
Two of the authors (H.B. and D.H ., both geriatrician-researchers, classified each article selected for the detailed review.
After the search phase, we performed an analysis of the methodological quality of each article selected for this review, based on an adapted version of the Cochrane Collaboration Tool for Assessing the Risk of Bias [ 44].
Similar(53)
Over 500 primary articles were reviewed with 143 articles selected for inclusion.
Articles selected for publications typically range from 20,000 to 40,000 words.
The literature search yielded 15 articles selected for this review that exhibited adequate methodological rigor.
The numbers of articles selected for each stage are shown.
▪ Articles published since 2003; including use of full reference list of all articles selected for review.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com