The phrase "article responsibility" is not commonly used in written English and may not convey a clear meaning.
It could potentially be used in contexts discussing the responsibilities associated with writing or publishing articles, but it lacks clarity without additional context.
Example: "The editor emphasized the importance of article responsibility in ensuring accurate and ethical reporting."
Alternatives: "editorial responsibility" or "writing accountability".
No one quoted in the article took responsibility for the threats or reliably pointed a finger elsewhere.
The trouble with Arizona's ballot initiative, he explained, is not that "somebody else got into the legislature's lane and purported to do something about elections" but that it completely cut out the legislature from its Article I responsibility.
Ray Demarest Incline Village, Nev., Dec. 21, 2008 To the Editor: While the article pinning responsibility for the worldwide financial mess on the Bush administration is on the mark, it would be unfair to suggest that the administration or the Republicans did it single-handedly.
A staunch critic of U.S. foreign policy, he arose to public attention for these views in 1967, when The New York Times published his article, "The Responsibility of Intellectuals", a criticism of the Vietnam War.
He added, with a hint of exasperation, "This is not the proper way to discharge our Article III responsibilities.
(On the other hand, the publisher of the normally conservative Yomiuri Shimbun attacked Koizumi's Yasukuni visits and published a fascinating series of articles on responsibility for the war).
In the article, Mr. Weber said responsibility for the difficulties was shared by all "from the C.E.O. to regional management".
However, the article overstates Democratic responsibility, and understates Republican, for the glacial pace of confirmations that has left the courts with more than 75 vacancies throughout the last three years.
He did not discuss the impact of his findings on the finances of an independent Scotland; that part of the article is the responsibility of The Economist.There are no "facts", arithmetic or otherwise, about what the effects of oil revenues would have been on the finances of an independent Scotland from 1979 to 1997.
