In this example, the author of the article judged that "Fig. 4" is the most important, while our system ranked "Fig. 3" as most important.
It is tempting, after a week of sampling for articles, judging competitions, visiting distilleries, and attending launches, to hit the town at the weekend with my mates, merrily chugging back beer and beer with little or no regard for my liver and the punishment it has endured in the previous five days of 'professional use'.
KB and KA were responsible for reviewing articles, judging their relevance, assessing their quality, and extracting data.
DH and VS were responsible for reviewing articles, judging their relevance, assessing their quality, and extracting data.
We reviewed the reference lists of paper identified and included articles judged as relevant.
As part of our realist review, four researchers read and independently coded those articles judged relevant to tagging.
Facebook's assertions here mesh with a report from the New York Times this evening that says a former employees of Facebook's trend curation team told it that "Any 'suppression,'…was based on perceived credibility — any articles judged by curators to be unreliable or poorly sourced, whether left-leaning or right-leaning, were avoided, though this was a personal judgment call".
To examine construct validity, we hypothesized that incorrect descriptions of VS would be more frequent in articles judged to be incomplete than in articles judged to be complete.
Articles judged as complete were further evaluated for completeness of reporting.
Importantly, we found that articles judged to be incomplete were more likely to report incorrect description of VS, thus confirming the construct validity of the scoring system.
