Sentence examples for article for inclusion from inspiring English sources
Twenty papers were included in the final review after screening each article for inclusion criteria (a study selection flow chart is presented in Fig. 1).
Two readers (D. P. and D. S ., independently determined the eligibility of each article for inclusion.
In case of overlapping cohorts, full texts were obtained to select the most informative article for inclusion.
X.Z. and W.T. reviewed each article for inclusion and abstracted, reviewed, and verified the data using a standardized abstraction template.
Two of three reviewers (EG, HH, PY) then independently reviewed each full text article for inclusion and documented reasons for exclusion from the review.
The references of included articles were also reviewed, yielding an additional 4 articles for inclusion.
Duplicates were removed before final screening of articles for inclusion in the review.
Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram of identification of articles for inclusion adapted from Moher et al. (2009).
From the full text, using the above-mentioned criteria, the reviewers independently selected articles for inclusion in this review.
Researchers have no empirically based search stopping rule when looking for potentially relevant articles for inclusion in systematic reviews.
Two reviewers (C.L and J.S). independently performed a full article review of the remaining articles for inclusion and study quality, then discussed the articles until they reached consensus.
