Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "article for content" is not correct and lacks clarity in written English.
It may be intended to refer to an article that provides content or information, but the phrasing is awkward and ambiguous.
Example: "The article for content needs to be revised to better engage the audience."
Alternatives: "content article" or "article about content".
Exact(23)
BBM reviewed and edited the article for content and clarity.
JH: conception and design of the work, sampling of data and revising the article for content.
WFK: revising the article for content and approval of the version to be published.
MK: conception and design of the work, sampling of data, revising the article for content.
ACY made substantial contributions to study design and data acquisition and revised the article for content.
The views expressed All not necessauthorshose of the criticallyncil.
Similar(37)
RW revised the article for intellectual content.
SCR, JML, DJB, and CJS were responsible for critical revision of the article for intellectual content.
MLW, HYC and CAH were responsible for critical revision of the article for intellectual content.
All authors revised the article for intellectual content and approved the final version.
CR participated in study design, interpretation of data, and revising the article for intellectual content.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com