The phrase "article flow" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the organization and progression of content within an article, particularly in writing or editing contexts.
Example: "To improve the article flow, we should rearrange some sections for better coherence and readability."
Alternatives: "content flow" or "narrative flow".
In this article, Flow-through microdialysis, which is routinely exploited in neurochemical and pharmacokinetic studies is presented, as a powerful in situ sample-pre-treatment technique for environmental assays.
We did keep the order of presentation, though, since the article flowed more naturally this way.
Olivier Laurent, writing on the British Journal of Photography website, agrees with Ollier: "By choosing to maintain the newspaper's usual design - with its articles flowing around the spaces where images should have been shown - Libération has succeeded in its attempt to show the power and importance of photography in our understanding of world events".
With staff members staying late, coming back in or working from home, The Times assembled an impressive, tour de force report in print and, through early Monday, online as a deep mix of articles flowed onto the Web from around the world.
Notice that Electromagnetism and Interdisciplinary physics are the two sub-fields with the smallest percentage of missing links, i.e., those in which knowledge among articles flows effectively and as would be expected if citations were driven by overlaps between topics or research problems.
In the current article, the flow field, structures, and mean and rms values of the temperature, mixture fraction, and species concentrations are discussed.
I take issue with your Feb. 5 Arts pages article "Cash Flow Plagues Ballet Theater".
In this article, the flow field around an airship with propellers blowing is calculated on the basis of the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations with SST turbulent models.
Yes, but its June projection of 3.5% to 4.2% growth in 2011 seemed too high; the new projection of 3% to 3.6% is pretty much where I am.Since I wrote my article, the flow of data has generally backed it.
