Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(4)
In the gene array, we calculated the exact p-values from one-way ANCOVA.
For each gene represented on the array, we calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient between its expression level at each time point and the ordinal time value.
Based on the localization of CUX1 binding sites on the ENCODE array, we calculated that between 17.2% to 26.6% of CUX1 binding sites would be identified on commercially available promoter arrays (Table 4).
For the clusters represented on the array, we calculated: 1) the false negatives (those that were not captured by the SGH array, but are present in the WGS, represented in yellow in Figure 2); and 2) the false positives (those that were captured on the SGH array but are absent in the WGS, represented in orange in Figure 2).
Similar(56)
Then for each array, we calculate its GVL.
Since many genes are represented by more than one probe set on the Affymetrix® HG-U133Plus2 arrays, we calculated the mean expression values for each gene, as defined by the RefSeq annotation, Affymetrix® annotation tables, December 2005 version (http://www.affymetrix.com/index.affx).affx
From these 11,636 arrays
To visualize the array data, we calculated a fold change ratio for every array position based on its normalized average intensity in each treatment (i.e., JH, SHE, LS, LR) divided by its normalized average intensity in the control (acetone) treatment.
To reduce bias because of array clustering, we calculated pair wise relatedness of all individuals caught in the same array, and then used the mean of those within-array measures to calculate within patch relatedness.
For each of these array selections, we calculated the standard deviation (SD) for each probe set available on the array and ranked them from lowest to highest SD. Figure 2A shows the results for 20 commonly used reference genes across all arrays (a), and across tissue-specific subsets of arrays (b).
For each gene (referred to as a 'transcript cluster' on the exon array platform), we calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient of the signal intensities of all possible pairs of probes across the 11 tissues (a total of 33 samples).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com