The phrase "armed status" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to security, military, or law enforcement to describe whether an individual or entity is equipped with weapons.
Example: "The security team assessed the armed status of the personnel before allowing them access to the restricted area."
Alternatives: "weapon status" or "armament condition".
Study participants and the staff members are not blinded to the study arm status.
Participation will be also be reported by age, socio-economic status (SES), cultural background, Indigenous status and time since last Pap test (for under-screened only) within each screening group and trial arm status.
Owing to the nature of the intervention, it will not be possible to blind staff, service users and carers to the study arm status at each wave when the clusters have been allocated to the intervention arm.
However, outcome assessors are blinded to intervention arm status, and both the primary outcome and most of the secondary outcomes are evaluated objectively (i.e., assays or automated measurements).
Because of the small number of patients in certain diagnostic groups as well as the small number of patients with unchanged or worsened self-rated arm status the results involving these groups may need to be interpreted with caution.
In the first ROC analysis the DASH and QuickDASH were compared with regard to their ability to discriminate the patients who rated their arm status as "much better" or "somewhat better" (combined into one group) from those who rated it as "unchanged".
In the ROC analysis of change scores among patients who rated their arm status as somewhat or much better and those who rated it as unchanged the difference in the area under the ROC curve for the DASH and QuickDASH was 0.01 (95% CI -0.05 0.07) indicating similar discriminant ability.
In all analyses, the confidence intervals for the difference contained null, indicating that no differences were found between the DASH and the QuickDASH in their ability to discriminate among groups that differed in the degree of self-rated improvement in arm status after surgery.
In the ROC analysis of the change scores for the patients who rated their arm status after surgery as better (including "much better" and "somewhat better") and those who rated it as "unchanged", the difference in the area under the ROC curves for the DASH and QuickDASH was 0.01 (95% CI -0.05 0.07), indicating no difference in their ability to discriminate between the 2 groups (Table 3).
The price of the creation of these imperial cities is that they actually provide decreasing opportunities for many of those who already live in them, or for those who move to them and are not already armed with resources, status, and education.
