Sentence examples for arm intensity from inspiring English sources

Fig. 2 Spatial patterns of the a phi scale mean grain size (Seto et al. 2012), b magnetic susceptibility, and c ARM intensity of bottom sediments.

Fig. 4 Plots of magnetic susceptibility (measured in 2011 and 2015), ARM intensity at an 100 mT AF and 0.1 mT biasing field (measured in 2012 and 2015), and IRM intensity at 1.2 T (measured in 2012 and 2015) versus water depth.

As introduced by Peters and Thompson (1998), the two biplots of SIRM/kLF versus ARMdem40mT/ARM and IRM-0.1T/SIRM versus ARMdem40mT/ARM, where ARMdem40mT denotes the ARM intensity after demagnetization by a peak AF 40 mT, were employed to discriminate magnetic minerals with low coercivities.

The spatial distributions of magnetic susceptibility and ARM intensity data obtained at the peak AF of 100 mT (Fig. 2b, c) showed higher values along the lakeshore at water depths less than 5 m, and this area included the sites around the mouth of the Shichinohe-gawa and Sadoro-gawa rivers in the southwest part of the lake and the sites near the Takase-gawa River in the northeast part.

Then, the interferometric data are normalized by the reference arm intensity to remove any spectral dependence originating from the source and detector efficiency.

The ARM intensities measured in 2015 were about 1 order of magnitude lower than those obtained in 2012, and greater loss was observed at deeper sites.

Magnetic susceptibilities and ARM intensities at sites shallower than 10 m water depth were reasonably consistent before and after the storage period, but both parameters in mud samples decreased considerably with water depth, particularly below 16 m (Fig. 4).

For relative paleointensity estimation, anhysteretic remanent magnetization (ARM) was chosen as a normalizer of natural remanent magnetization (NRM) for compensating differences in NRM acquisition efficiency, and NRM and ARM intensities after AF demagnetization at 30 mT were used for calculating relative paleointensity.

Randomization is stratified according to history of myocardial infarction (MI) or ischemic stroke for balance across study arms, intensity of statin treatment (atorvastatin 40 to 80 mg daily, or rosuvastatin 20 to 40 mg daily versus simvastatin irrespective of the daily dose, atorvastatin below 40 mg daily or rosuvastatin below 20 mg daily), and geographic region (where applicable).

Local and systemic events were summarized as frequency tables of numbers of adverse events by vaccination sequence, study arm and intensity of reported event.

The pain drawing indicated pain in the anterior or posterior aspect of the forearm or hand, and mean arm pain intensity was above zero.