The phrase "arm flexion" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to anatomy, physical therapy, fitness, or biomechanics to describe the action of bending the arm at the elbow.
Example: "During the exercise, focus on the arm flexion to effectively target the biceps."
Alternatives: "elbow flexion" or "bending of the arm."
In addition, arm flexion significantly increased while leg, trunk and center of mass displacements remained unchanged across heights.
Affect congruent responses involved arm extension (avoidance) in response to angry faces and arm flexion (approach) in response to happy faces.
Moreover, people with disabilities (wheelchair users and arthritis sufferers) showed a considerable decrease in joint mobility for arm flexion, arm abduction, arm lateral rotation, elbow flexion, elbow supination, wrist extension and wrist flexion.
No significant differences (P >.05), except for a small 2° difference in transverse rotation during arm flexion at 110° (P =.002), were observed in 3D scapular attitudes and scapular total ROM between both shoulders of SIS subjects.
However, improvements were noticed for the arm flexion and abduction.
In a radiographer's dynamic body situation, the arm flexion posture was "acceptable" once it had been kept for a short period.
Onsets in transversus abdominis (TrA), obliquus internus abdominis (OI) and obliquus externus abdominis (OE) were recorded during rapid arm flexions in ten healthy subjects.
The position of the arms (flexion and abduction) was classified as "not acceptable" in the static situation and "acceptable" in motion for the same reason mentioned in the trunk assessment.
Trunk Forward/ backward bending CC 6.7° Acceptable OML 63.6° Not acceptable Sideways bending/twisting CC 0° Acceptable OML Arms Flexion CC 18.2° Acceptable OML 108.5° Not acceptable Abduction CC 41.4° Conditionally acceptable OML 118.6° Not acceptable Head/neck Upward/ downward bending CC 20° Acceptable OML 87.2° Not acceptable Sideways bending CC Not measurable OML.
The characteristics of these players when the injury was sustained are shown in tables 3 and 4. The mechanism involves the injured arm in flexion, specifically flexion above 90°.
