The phrase "arm entry was recorded" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts such as data collection, security systems, or any situation where the entry of an arm (or a person) is being documented.
Example: "The security system confirmed that the arm entry was recorded at 3:15 PM."
Alternatives: "arm entry was logged" or "arm entry was noted".
The sequence of arm entries was recorded manually.
The series of arm entries was recorded visually, and arm entry was considered to have been completed only when the hind paws of the mouse were placed completely in the arm of the maze.
Each mouse was placed at the end of one arm and allowed to explore the maze freely for 6 min. The total number of arm entries was recorded in addition to the calculation of the spontaneous alternation score; this was calculated as the number of alternations (entries in three different arms consecutively) divided by the total possible number of alternations (total number of arm entries two).
Mice were initially placed within one arm, and the sequence and number of arm entries were recorded 10-min period for each mouse and analyzed monitored by a video tracking system (ANY-maze, Stoelting, USA).
The percent of time spent in the open arm, the number of open arm entries, and the total number of arm entries were recorded by a camera mounted 1.3 m above the maze, and analysed using a computerised video tracking system (Ethovision 2.0; Noldus).
The time spent in closed arms and open/closed arm entries were recorded.
Further, the total arm entries were recorded as an index of locomotor activity.
The series of arm entries were recorded visually and arm entry was considered to be completed when the hind paws of the mouse were completely placed in the arm.
Then each mouse was placed in the center of the Y and arm entries were recorded by video camera and the order of entries were recorded for the first 15 entries.
