Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
Individual effect on surface roughness values in terms of arithmetical mean roughness (Ra) was studied by applying ANOVA.
In almost every corresponding investigation, the arithmetical mean roughness R a —which is measured by stylus profilometer is used as a parameter to describe implant surface roughness.
Arithmetical mean roughness values R a (measured by stylus profilometer) are inadequate for describing surface roughness with regard to its potential influence on microbial adhesion.
Additionally, arithmetical mean roughness values R a (measured by stylus profilometer) are inadequate for describing surface roughness in respect to its potential influence on microbial adhesion.
Two height descriptive parameters of roughness as R a and R z were used to quantify the surface roughness, where R a is the arithmetical mean roughness value from the profile mean along a defined sampling line, and R z is named as ten-point mean roughness which is the mean of maximum peak-to-valley height of 5 consecutive sections of the sampling line.
Similar(55)
While Rmax represents the maximal roughness, R z is defined as the arithmetic mean roughness from five consecutive sampling lengths.
3) See Figure 1 and full names and more characteristics of cantons in Appendix, Table 4. 4) MEAN = arithmetical mean; STD = standard deviation; MIN = minimal value; MAX = maximal value; EQ = extremal quotient.
The bonding strength increases with the arithmetical mean height of the surface roughness due to the initial oxide layer thickness.
The surface roughness of arithmetical mean height (Sa) of the film prepared using the solution of the concentration from 50 mM to 0.1 M decreases from 13.7 to 14.8 nm.
Ra is the arithmetic mean surface roughness in nanometers.
Traditional definitions of the surface roughness usually contain only local and one-dimensional information, and the arithmetical mean error Ra is regarded as the unique evaluation indices [29].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com