The phrase "arguments with no" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing situations or claims that lack supporting arguments or evidence.
Example: "The debate was unproductive, filled with arguments with no substantial evidence to back them up."
Alternatives: "claims without" or "points lacking".
Instead, the panel merely dismissed the arguments with no discussion of their merits at all.
The lawyers and activists supporting Mr. Phillips have repeatedly pressed similar speech and religion arguments, with no success in the lower courts, to advance a larger goal: creating a right of business owners to refuse service to gays and lesbians as a form of resistance to marriage equality.
Members huddled on the floor to create a unified backdrop and offered their arguments with no Republican rebuttal.
(If our analysis of the noun phrase seems questionable, the full sentence is Post hoc analysis of the data showed that, with the greatest concentration of propofol (1000 microM), there was increasing inhibition of metabolism of midazolam with increases of oxygen from 10 to 70%.) No argument present: Arguments with no surface realizations were explicitly marked as absent.
The Democrats complained that Mr. Ray's report resembled a prosecutor's closing argument, with no opportunity given to Mr. Clinton's lawyers to respond.
At one point, my (male) character is given a choice of either slapping or kissing my (female) rival mid-argument, with no alternative options.
Is our system shallow enough — and in particular, are our media so much into appearances rather than reality — that it's OK to lie to win an argument, with no further consequences?
The film hasn't done well despite early attention when it was removed from the Tribeca Film Festival partly because it's just not very good and largely because it presents a flimsy argument with no reliable evidence but plenty of holes.
Educational funding for students with disabilities became the subject of yet another heated partisan argument with no resolution at a budget hearing Tuesday, after Rep. John Kline (R-Minn).
A University of Massachusetts study found that managers were willing to accept an auditor's argument with no supporting evidence if he or she was likeable, and Jack Zenger found that just 1 in 2000 unlikeable leaders are considered effective.
It's an argument with no absolute answer, and again, a moot point because the damage is already done by the time we get around to having these conversations.
