The phrase "arguments to decide" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the reasons or points that are presented in order to make a decision on a particular issue or topic.
Example: "The committee reviewed all the arguments to decide which proposal would best serve the community's needs."
Alternatives: "points for consideration" or "reasons for judgment".
And on June 17, Judge Scheindlin will hear arguments to decide whether UBS or Ms. Zubulake would have to pay for the recovery of any more files.
Robert Collins, a Federal judge in New Orleans, took charge of the Roland Barbay steroid case yesterday and scheduled arguments to decide today whether the Louisiana State University defensive end would be eligible to play in the Sugar Bowl game against Nebraska tomorrow despite test results showing he used banned chemicals.
In a tentative ruling, she rejected their arguments to decide the case, which could clear the way for trial.
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States began oral arguments to decide whether the U.S. Constitution allows for states to discriminate against gay and lesbian couples by denying them the right to marry.
Several questions and concerns about the reliability, reproducibility and quality of microarray data have been raised [ 2] and despite important recent advances in the evaluation of the existing technologies, some questions remain unanswered [ 3] and the scientist is often lacking arguments to decide on which approach is best suited for his purpose.
It also called for further argument to decide whether Negro children should be admitted forthwith to schools of their choice or whether a gradual adjustment may be made to non-segregated schools.
Nevertheless, an isolated value of PPV (even above 17%) cannot be considered as the sole argument to decide fluid therapy.
The Assembly Democrats were criticized by city officials last year for eliminating the commuter tax paid by people who work in New York City but live elsewhere, and used the arguments from that debate to decide the hotel tax issue.
The HYPO family of systems implements a "lazy" approach since they defer making arguments how to decide a problem until the programs have positioned a new problem with respect to similar past cases.
When lawyers test the evidence, they do so not to get as close to the truth as they can, but to make an argument or to decide whether a law has been broken or upheld.
This possibility creates challenges for PtDA developers in terms of identifying attributes of options, selecting evidence or arguments to include, deciding on the level of detail, deciding under which option to mention an argument, assessing the quality of underlying evidence, and choosing a format for presenting the information.
