To sketch some of the main lines of argument in this literature, consider the ontological, cosmological, and teleological arguments, arguments from the problem of evil, and the argument over the cognitive status of religious experience.
On this argument, the problem with private health insurance is not that market forces do not work: it is that reforms have not gone far enough to allow proper competition to emerge.
According to this argument, the problem with indivisibilism arises from thinking compositionally about the continuous, because there is a mismatch between the idea of compositionality on the one hand and the idea of infinite divisibility on the other.
Following this argument, the problem of obesity becomes one of diet quantity (people eating too much of a wide variety of nutritious foods) not quality (people eating a diet dominated by nutrient poor, energy-dense foods).
The problem is not that economists are starting to doubt their own arguments -- the problem is that the rest of society neither understands nor believes them.
He wrote many letters dismissing the philosopher's arguments, but the problem did not seem to go away.
Technical issues have been an obstacle, but so have N.R.A. arguments that the problem is relatively insignificant and the technology unneeded.
What is at stake in these arguments is "the problem of the criterion"—i.e., the problem of determining a justifiable standard against which to measure the worth or validity of judgments, or claims to knowledge.
Both views thus have serious problems, though, in light of the last argument, the problems of the sense-datum theory look more serious.
A crucial part of the argument that the Problem of the Many is the argument that every oi is a cloud.
