More specific arguments originate from the participatory theory of democracy and the critique of a lack of responsiveness and legitimacy of representative (party) democracy.
This solution is extrapolated to cover the finite impedance case by employing arguments originating from Jonasson [2].
He considers arguments originating from Descartes and others that some kind of higher-order thought is required for experience to be morally significant.
(In this, he is persuaded by a form of argument originated by Harry Frankfurt. See Frankfurt 1969 and Fischer 1994, Ch.7 for an important development of the argument. The argument has been debated extensively in recent years. See Widerker and McKenna 2003 for a representative sampling. For very recent work, see Franklin 2009 and Fischer 2010 and the works they cite).
In this section, we shall establish the existence of constant-sign solutions of the systems (1.1) and (1.2), in (C[0, T]) n, (C l [0, ∞)) n and (BC[0, ∞)) n. Once again, we shall employ an argument originated from Brezis and Browder [11].
While this argument originates at least as far back as Genesis 18 23 32 in the Bible, as well as versions by Maimonides and Sir John Fortescue, Blackstone's analysis is the one picked up by Benjamin Franklin and others, so that the term has become known as "Blackstone's Ratio".
The best developed argument, originating with the Wilcox-Russell hypothesis [ 2, 4, 5], is supported by qualitative analyses using directed acyclic graphs [ 6].
These counter-factual arguments primarily originated from David Rose at the Mail on Sunday, whose article Bob Ward accurately described as containing "embarrassing errors" to the extent of being a "humiliation" for the Mail on Sunday.
Ironically, that group of rationalisations (AGI has already been done/is trivial/exists in apes/is a cultural conceit) are mirror images of arguments that originated in the AGI-is-impossible camp.
